Thunder and Lightning and Social Media Super Success (the #icebucketchallenge)

ligthening strikes Yesterday I was on BBC Stoke Radio for a little while answering questions about why the #icebucketchallenge has become such a viral phenomena.

I used the analogy of lightning and how it has be part of a perfect storm of technology and psychology. 

I didn’t have time to say that much and I was told is would be edited which it wasn’t but you can hear it here.

Starts around 1.08 minutes in and lasts about 5 minutes. 

BUT….anyhoo…  

My point is still valid – which is that trying to predict a viral sensation is like predicted where and when lightning will strike. And as we know for millions of hours of manpower and billions of pounds in investment in meteorology that the weather alone is hard enough to predict. 

So why are we trying to predict both? 

One reason is the amount of power in lightening (or a social media phenomena).

“A typical lightning bolt contains about 15 million volts of electricity and instantly heats up the air around it to over 60,000 degrees, with some reaching more than 100,000 degrees. That’s why the total energy of a strong thunderstorm can exceed the energy released during an atomic explosion. Power of Lightning – Department of Atmospheric Sciences

For it’s mirror the #icebucketchallenge as a phenomena has created more than £50 million in charity donations in a month. So the power of both is potentially amazing. 

The other reason we investigate it is because the onlooker wants us to.i.e. lightning is impressive, for the media the #icebucketchallenge is amazing. We all want answers. 

lighetning amazing

We look to the heavens for answers naturally.

From a scientific POV, “Thunderstorms are an amazing natural spectacle, but even more amazing is the fact that we still don’t totally understand the processes which create lightning. What we do know is that lightning is a discharge of the static electricity that builds up in clouds in certain weather conditions”

So sadly, in reality, even through it amazing.

Lightning is not God – it is scientifically produced. But it is awe inspiring like God (or the belief in God.)

Marketing wise, the #icebucketchallenge obeys certain rules as well (12 of which I blog about here.) 

Another way that this is all like a Thunderstorm.

Is that one of the rules in weather is that thunder has to come AFTER lightning. Here I think the thunder is like being on the radio or the BBC breakfast sofa talking about after the “event”.

Scientifically explained “Lightning always comes just before thunder because it is the heat of lightning that causes thunder. Lightning is seen when there is a discharge of atmospheric electricity in the clouds or between clouds and the ground. The energy from the lightning heats the air and causes a sudden expansion of the air (followed by a rapid contraction), which results in the sound called thunder.”*

Marketing wise, the traditional media is now the thunder, turning up with a bang after the event, making everyone realize what’s happened but always coming after it. Social media now makes lightening happen first. The newspapers thunder on about whether it is a good or a bad thing. Which, of course, missing the point. Lightning is neither good or bad – it just is. Unless you get stuck by it or it sets fire to something…. but again this is subjective. 

But can you harness viral? 

The reported for the BBC, didn’t seem to like my answer that you couldn’t predict virality but I truly believe you cannot. Which is why it’s so amazing when it happens like this.lightening in a bottle

What worries me in marketing is that people want to know because we think we can harness it i.e. lightening or viral sensations (or even worse capture it in a bottle.)

From a scientific POV, it might not even be that great if you COULD power homes off lightning.  

As even in the best location on earth, the east of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, near Kifuka, where every year about 158 strikes take place per square kilometre.

Even if all of the energy from these strikes was captured with 100 per cent efficiency over an area of 5 square kilometres, it would supply only 236 average UK homes. 

As they report “If ALL its energy could be captured, an average lightning bolt would provide about 5 billion joules, equivalent to 0.85 barrels of oil. But there are problems capturing all of this, not least that the electrical energy arrives sporadically in time and place. It also delivers extremely high power, which makes capturing the energy problematic as any conductors must be able to carry high power without suffering damage – melting at high temperatures.”

micehal fishSo in the end you cannot harness lightning that easily, just like social it has a mind of it’s own, just like social, lightening strikes and often the most during hot days and lazy nights.

Whilst those who try to predict it – can end up looking foolish – and those who tried to contain it do so at their peril. 

The biggest thing perhaps is that we can learn more and more when these storms and strikes happen and just marvel at how amazing it all is.

Plus, remind ourselves that this is probably why we invented electricity, as something we could manage and turn on and off, a little like PPC marketing in the end.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s